OutSourcedNews(OSN)

On 1/4/2010 11:29 PM, 
 This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it
  wrote:

> On Jan 3, 4:41 pm, Beam Me Up Scotty <Then-Destroy-Everyth...@Talk-n-
> dog.com> wrote:

>> Obama's enhanced individual rights violations.....  Scanning that looks
>> through your clothing so now you get to be ogled by the government.
>>
>> How is it that *Obama who was so concerned for the* *terrorists rights*
>> being violated under enhanced interrogations is now totally unconcerned
>> about violating *REAL* citizens covered by the constitution?
>>
>> *Obama sides with the terrorists and throws the people under the bus*
>>

>>
>>                    *BE VERY CONCERNED*
>>
>>   *The Civil war has begun and you just don't know it*   ....Look at the
>> Liberal attacks on the people that raise their heads above the crowd,
>> the Liberals/Socialists viciously attempt to destroy them.
>>
>> Joe the Plumber and Palin and Now Wilson and dozens in between.
>>
>> They attack on every front, Internet hacking attacks, frivolous legal
>> attacks to consume energy and money, Personal attacks on opponents and
>> family. Propaganda attacks are coordinated across Liberal Media the
>> Unions and the Executive Branch and Congress and community organizing
>> foot soldiers...
>>
>> If you remember back to the Revolutionary war, the War was waged by
>> *targeting the officers* of the English military to create disarray and
>> confusion in our enemy.
>>
>> The Progressive-Socialists have been using this tactic for some time
>> now, they have adopted Saul Alinsky's plan to target their opponents and
>> viscously destroy them, these Socialists even try to *destroy the*
>> *Families* to destroy anyone that would show signs of organizing the
>> opposition into a cohesive resistance to the Socialist steam roller.
>>
>> We haven't yet progressed to large battles with shooting in the streets
>> but we have violence and protests and subversive sabotage of the enemy.
>> Obama has declared war on his enemy and they are us.
>>
>> The left has created a third front in America's war and it is the Civil
>> War against capitalism, the *Socialist In Chief* has decided to attack
>> our own, and in the midst of a foreign war he has increased the
>> hostility against our own people.
>>
>> The Socialists have diverted the interest in winning in Afghanistan for
>> the attack and domination of the economy, for Socialism over Capitalism
>> and for the Government over the people of the USA.

> 
> If you do not want to have to go through the scans you do not have to
> fly because that is not a right.

If you do *NOT* want to be scanned you do not have to walk on a public
sidewalk?

Maybe your Government should require people to get a license to ride in
an airplane.

And make Government force people to sign the license that says they will
submit to a full body scan, like the government had to do to get Drunks
to submit to breathalyzers.... because it is unconstitutional for
government to search your body without a warrant.  And actually there is
no allowance in the constitution for people to give consent.

But then government can't deny you use, if you say no to the search.

Because that makes your right to NOT be searched, subject to
*government_coercion* as in being tortured to get a confession. And your
rights are NOT a bargaining chip for government to negotiate with, it is
yours and government can't infringe or put demands on you to exercise it.

*In short you can't give up a right without a constitutional amendment*
you can't give up your right to free speech or your right to keep and
bear arms, you can choose not to exercise them. But the right to not be
searched is actually a limit on government to keep them from stepping on
your personal privacy.

So while you may grant permission to government to search you, that
doesn't remove the constitutional law that prevents government from
searching your person without a warrant.  In essence the constitution
applies to the government and no one person can change that
constitutional requirement to get a warrant.


"Amendment IV
The right of the people to be *secure in their persons* , houses,
papers, and effects, *against unreasonable searches* and seizures,
*shall not be violated* , and *no Warrants shall issue* ,
*but upon probable cause* , supported by Oath or affirmation, and
particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or
things to be seized."


There is no "right" for you to make the government above this amendment,
even if you say they may search... that does not nullify the fact the
constitution forces the government to get a warrant.

There is no such thing in this amendment that says consenting to the
search would nullify the governments requirements in the amendment.